<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A better F# project system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hill30.com/MikeFeingoldBlog/index.php/2010/02/08/a-better-f-project-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hill30.com/MikeFeingoldBlog/index.php/2010/02/08/a-better-f-project-system/</link>
	<description>In my journey through technologies Microsoft and otherwise I faced many wonders good and bad, useful and dangerous. For some time now I live with a growing feeling that some of my encounters can be of interest for people beyond the immediate circle of my friends. This blog is my attempt to share with you some of my stories.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:46:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Feingold</title>
		<link>http://www.hill30.com/MikeFeingoldBlog/index.php/2010/02/08/a-better-f-project-system/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Feingold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hill30.com/MikeFeingoldBlog/?p=293#comment-280</guid>
		<description>I do. Once I am done with porting NDjango editor to VS2010 RC I will go back to Bistro designer - which was the original intended target, but it might make sense to implement it as a separate flavoring. I just want to set expectations here. If this project system is implemented as a flavor of the MS F# project system, it might inherit from it some limitations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do. Once I am done with porting NDjango editor to VS2010 RC I will go back to Bistro designer - which was the original intended target, but it might make sense to implement it as a separate flavoring. I just want to set expectations here. If this project system is implemented as a flavor of the MS F# project system, it might inherit from it some limitations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.hill30.com/MikeFeingoldBlog/index.php/2010/02/08/a-better-f-project-system/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hill30.com/MikeFeingoldBlog/?p=293#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Mike, do you have any plans to publish the vs extensions you did for supporting folders in F# projects? I think your idea of moving the compile order to a different page is fantastic, and I honestly can&#039;t believe the F# team expect us to manage big projects in a flat project structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, do you have any plans to publish the vs extensions you did for supporting folders in F# projects? I think your idea of moving the compile order to a different page is fantastic, and I honestly can't believe the F# team expect us to manage big projects in a flat project structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

